Skip to content

Index

Gmail spam filtering degraded?

In the last few weeks or so, I've noticed a marked increase in the number of spam emails that are making it into my Gmail inbox. It would be very interesting to know how the spammers vs. Google arms race is going. I've got to believe that Google is working hard on the problem, but given that this was one of the main benefits, at least for me, of going to Gmail, it is a bit of a worry. Anyone else notice this? p.s. This blog posting is a classic "cc: World" message. I want to ask everyone who I might know who is using Gmail, but boy would it be annoying to actually send an email to all of them! Technorati Tags: gmail, security

Hacking the papal election

I have to admit to being fascinated with the Vatican, and the ancient , elaborate traditions and rules that surround the papacy. Bruce Schneier, in his (excellent) monthly newsletter had a really interesting discussion about the rules and procedures that have been set down (and fairly recently updated) for the papal election:

"As the College of Cardinals prepares to elect a new pope, people like me wonder about the election process. How does it work, and just how hard is it to hack the vote?" (from Crypto-Gram)

Did you realize that the Vatican publishes the complete election rules online? It is quite interesting, if nothing else, to see how detailed they are, and that they are in (the Pope's) first person:

"After careful reflection I have therefore decided that the only form by which the electors can manifest their vote in the election of the Roman Pontiff is by secret ballot, in accordance with the rules set forth below. This form offers the greatest guarantee of clarity, straightforwardness, simplicity, openness and, above all, an effective and fruitful participation on the part of the Cardinals who, individually and as a group, are called to make up the assembly which elects the Successor of Peter." (from UNIVERSI DOMINICI GREGIS)

Who thought of it first? Who cares?

Microsoft and Apple are arguing about who came up first with the idea of having a pervasive search capability built into the OS Apple is shipping it imminently in Tiger, and Microsoft, eventually , in Longhorn. Well let's see: Windows had a broken Find command in the start menu forever. Apple has had find in the finder forever. Microsoft was talking about this kind of pervasive Find capability since Cairo.

"As described by Nash, the Cairo directory will maintain separate stores for files and the directory, but the file system will be extensible so users can add attributes, such as who created it, to a file identifier. The directory will be able to search for objects using those attributes, according to Nash." (from a Network World article of 4/8/96 - 9 Years ago!)****

I say, who cares? It is mind boggling that it's taken them this long to actually make it into the OS. Both Apple and Microsoft are way late. I also say, the only thing that matters is shipping the functionality to customers, and looking at it that way, clearly Apple gets props over Microsoft.

Losing a finger over biometrics

"They stripped Mr Kumaran naked and left him by the side of the road - but not before cutting off the end of his index finger with a machete. (from the BBC)"

There, I got your attention , didn't I? That's from the always fascinating monthly mailing on security, Crypto- Gram, from Bruce Schneier. He has a very interesting piece on "New Risks of Biometrics", where you can see the law of unintended consequences in full bloom:

"It's certainly possible to design fingerprint readers that test for "liveness": pulse, body temperature, etc. But these new security countermeasures will result in new criminal tactics, and the cycle will continue."

A similar scenario was used in the movie "Minority Report" which at the time might have seem outlandish, but now, I guess not so much. By the way, here's another bit of Minority report futurism is now creeping into reality:

"In the futuristic movie "Minority Report," Tom Cruise gestures with his gloved hands to sift through crime-clue data that are displayed on giant screens. With the twist of a wrist he can move information from one column to another or delete items." (from the Wall Street Journal)

Technorati Tags: biometrics

American Idol Existentialism

For you closet viewers of American Idol (the TV Show), I thought you'd be amused by this new TV blog, and it's discussion of some of the latest developments on that show. If you don't know the show, let me briefly tell you about one aspect, the voting model , which has raised some interesting questions. Here 's how the voting works. Every week a set of contestants perform some song, and at the end "America" gets to vote on which one they liked best. Whoever wins the fewest votes that week is booted off and the following week the remaining contestants do it all over again. It has happened more than once that a contestant is booted off, who everyone agrees is among the best. And there's an outcry and wringing of hands about this - how could it happen? Is it racism? The votes are stacked! Here's what I think may be an explanation for oddball results on the polls. When asked to vote for our favorite, my tendency would be NOT to vote for someone that I think is THE BEST, on the theory that they will get lots of votes from others and hence be SAFE anyway. No , I would vote for the one that I think is at risk of being booted even though I think they are great, the underdog , in other words. If everyone did that, then it's possible that the one that everyone thought was the BEST would actually get booted! American Idol Existentialism!

IBM Patent Benevolence?

Doc comments with grudging admiration that IBM has decided to give away __ some parts of their much vaunted patent portfolio. One interesting tidbit is that in addition to being responsible for the most patents granted annually, IBM is also the leader in the most patents allowed to expire annually. Why? Because keeping all those patents current is very costly , and if there is no economic benefit to having those patents, that's a lot of money down the shute. So maybe some clever strategist/marketer (difference?) probably realized that the PR value of open sourcing these worthless patents might actually be the most valuable of all!

Is Google setting the hook?

Recently, GMail raised the free storage available to all subscribers to 2 Gig! Amazing isn't it? I don't know how they do it - they must have a monstrous number of subscribers all over the world. And they are getting hooked , really hooked. Take me for example - I was getting worried when I had about 600 Meg of archival emails, in about 4 months! What would I do when it filled up? And then they raised the limit. Talk about lock-in! GMail is essential different from all other Google services, in that they are storing personal and private information. It cannot have escaped Google that they could decide from one day to the next to start charging for this. It could be very modest. $1 per month? $5.95 per month? Yes there would be the usual self-righteous outcry from the entitlement crowd, but I bet perhaps in 6 or 12 months the number of defections wouldn't be proportionally, that high. And the amount of revenue would be incredible!